ArticleCirculation reports2026
Safety and Efficacy of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (EV-ICD) in Japanese Patients: Final Results From the EV ICD Japan Study.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) has proven efficacy and a low complication rate in global populations, but data from Japanese patients is limited. We report the safety and efficacy of the EV-ICD system in a Japanese cohort through 12 months of follow-up. Methods and Results: Patients from Japan with a Class I or IIa indication for a single-chamber ICD were enrolled and implanted with the EV-ICD system. Defibrillation success was determined following implant. System programming changes, device electrical performance, freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications through 12 months post-implant, and follow-up status at all visits were assessed. From February to September 2023, 14 patients (12 males, 2 females) were enrolled and successfully implanted across 2 sites (age: 53.6±14.7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 52.6±15.6%; secondary prevention: 42.9%). Defibrillation testing was successful in all patients (14/14, 100%). At 2 weeks and 12 months, freedom from major system- and/or procedure-related complications was 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. One patient received 7 appropriate shocks that were successful in terminating the arrhythmia. There were no inappropriate shocks delivered, and a single inappropriate antitachycardia pacing therapy was delivered through follow-up. Conclusions: The EV-ICD system was safely implanted and effective at terminating both induced and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in a small cohort of Japanese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.