ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Emerging genes implicated in human congenital heart disease: a 2023-2025 scoping review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common major congenital anomaly and a leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality. The rapid expansion of genomic technologies has accelerated the discovery of rare genetic variants implicated in CHD pathogenesis. However, most individuals with CHD still lack an identifiable molecular etiology. The purpose of this scoping review is to systematically characterize genes reported in the recent literature as candidate CHD-associated genes and contextualize these findings within the stages of cardiac morphogenesis. Methods: PubMed was searched using predefined terms related to CHD and genetic variants, supplemented by a prospectively maintained internal database. We included human studies published between January 2023 and December 2025 that identified pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or uncertain monogenic variants in at least one patient with CHD. Animal-only studies, chromosomal abnormalities, copy number variants, multigenic associations, transcriptomic/proteomic analyses, reviews, and maternal-only genetic studies were excluded. Gene-disease validity classifications were assigned using the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) CHD Gene Curation Expert Panel framework. Results: Of 2,834 screened articles, 391 studies met inclusion criteria, identifying 912 unique genes reported as candidate CHD-associated genes. Frequently reported genes included Conclusions: Recent literature substantially expands the catalog of candidate genes that may be associated with CHD and highlights the biologic complexity underlying cardiac morphogenesis. Integration of genomic, developmental, and functional approaches will be essential to improve mechanistic understanding, refine genetic counseling, and support future precision medicine strategies for CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.