ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
A bibliometric analysis of quantitative computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease research based on Web of Science: trends, hotspots, and future directions (2005-2025).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous lung condition not fully captured by spirometry. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) enables objective characterization of emphysema, airway remodeling, and other structural abnormalities, playing key roles in early recognition, phenotyping, and prognosis. Despite growing literature in this field, no comprehensive bibliometric synthesis has mapped the intellectual structure, collaborative networks, or thematic evolution of QCT research in COPD. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a structured overview of the field over the past two decades. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using the topic formula: TS=(("quantitative computed tomography" OR "quantitative CT" OR "QCT" OR "CT quantification" OR "quantitative CT assessment") AND ("chronic obstructive pulmonary disease" OR "COPD" OR "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease*")). Publications from 2005 to 2025 were included, limited to English original articles and reviews. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers; studies not primarily focusing on QCT-based quantitative analysis in COPD were excluded. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Bibliometric and visual analyses were conducted using CiteSpace 6.4.R1, VOSviewer 1.6.19, and the R package bibliometrix. Results: A total of 300 publications (279 original articles, 21 reviews) were included. The United States was the leading contributor in overall output and international collaboration. The University of Iowa was the most productive institution, Hoffman EA was the most prolific author, and the International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease was the most productive journal. Keyword and thematic analyses revealed a clear evolutionary trajectory: early research (2005-2012) focused on technical quantification of emphysema and airway abnormalities; a transitional phase (2013-2018) emphasized "phenotypes" and disease heterogeneity; and the recent period (2019-2025) has seen rising attention to prognostic evaluation, mortality prediction, and artificial intelligence-assisted analysis. Conclusions: This study confirms a shift from morphologic quantification toward clinically actionable imaging biomarkers. However, the existing literature suffers from several critical gaps: lack of standardized acquisition and analysis protocols, predominance of cross-sectional designs, and insufficient external validation of artificial intelligence models. Future research should prioritize multicenter prospective validation, integration with multi-omics data for endotyping, and development of open-source automated pipelines to facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.