ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Forecasting the risk of early death among patients suffering from lung cancer with brain metastasis after radiotherapy using interpretable machine learning: a study based on the SEER database.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer with brain metastasis (LCBM) significantly shortens patient survival. Accurately predicting individual prognosis remains challenging. This study aimed to identify key prognostic factors in LCBM patients after radiotherapy for the development of an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to support clinical decision-making and precision medicine. Methods: Based on clinicopathological data from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, patients were divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Thirteen variables associated with early death were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for model construction. Seven ML-based models were compared using area under the curve (AUC) values, calibration and decision curves, specificity, precision, and F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret the optimal model. Results: The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model achieved satisfactory performance in the validation set, with an AUC of 0.776, and showed good accuracy and clinical utility. SHAP analysis revealed that chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of early death, while younger age and lower T stage were also associated with better outcomes. Conversely, bone, liver, and lung metastases were associated with a higher risk of early death. Conclusions: This ML-based prediction model may help quantify the risk of early death in LCBM patients after radiotherapy, providing references for clinicians to improve prognostic evaluation and optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.