Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Interpretable and explainable predictive machine learning models for gastric retention before gastroscopy.

Yun Dai, Huan-Zhong Su, Hong-Bin Zhang, Jin-Hai Chen, Guo-Xing Xu, Hai-Xing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun Dai *Department of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Huan-Zhong Su *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hong-Bin Zhang *Department of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jin-Hai ChenDepartment of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Guo-Xing XuDepartment of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hai-Xing WangDepartment of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of gastric retention (GR) is challenging in clinical practice. We aimed to develop and validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models for predicting GR risk using routinely available clinical features. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 3,233 consecutive patients (training cohort: Results: LASSO regression identified 12 clinically actionable predictors from 19 candidate variables, which were subsequently used to develop nine ML models. Among these models, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.710 (95% CI: 0.681-0.738) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis revealed that the XGBoost model exhibited superior clinical utility compared to other models. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) identified the use of anticholinergic drugs, pyloric obstruction, analgesic use, systemic diseases, and a history of gastrointestinal surgery as the top five important predictive features. Conclusions: This study establishes an interpretable GR risk stratification model using routinely available preoperative variables. The model may serve as an auxiliary screening aid for pre-gastroscopy risk assessment.

Indexed as

gastric retentiongastroscopymachine learningpredictive modelrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42724729
PMCPMC13560489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.