ArticleMatrix biology plus2026
RPE-derived extracellular matrix improves graft retention and photoreceptor preservation in preclinical models of retinal degeneration.
Article in Matrix biology plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Human pluripotent stem cells-derived retinal pigment epithelium (hPSC-RPE) represent a promising therapeutic approach for macular degeneration. This study examines whether RPE-derived extracellular matrix (RPE-ECM), enhances survival and functional outcomes following hPSC-RPE suspension transplantation in a preclinical model of retinal degeneration. Methods: hPSC-RPE cells were cultured under three conditions: control, RPE-conditioned medium (RPE-CM), and RPE-ECM. In vitro, the cells were assessed for proliferation, monolayer organization, and gene expression. In vivo, GFP-labeled hPSC-RPE cells were co-transplanted with the corresponding treatments into the subretinal space of a mouse model of retinal degeneration. For functional assessment, the cells were injected into RCS rats, with visual acuity tracked over six months using optomotor response testing. Retinal morphometry was analyzed by immunohistology techniques to evaluate graft integration and structural rescue. Results: In vitro, culture of hPSC-RPE cells with RPE-ECM enhanced proliferation and promoted monolayer formation, and increased Nidogen expression. In vivo, co-transplantation with RPE-ECM significantly improved mice retinal graft integration (47.1% vs. 3.6% in control, Conclusion: These findings suggest that co-transplantation with RPE-ECM enhances the integration and function performance of hPSC-RPE cells and may represent a promising strategy to improve graft viability within the host retina. Nevertheless, this study has several limitations, including short-term assessment in animal models and the lack of detailed ECM compositional analysis. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to evaluate the long-term transplantation potential of this approach in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.