ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Comparative phylogenetic analysis of breast cancer susceptibility genes reveals evolutionary conservation supporting diagnostic barcode design.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer susceptibility genes play essential roles in DNA repair, cell-cycle regulation, and tumor suppression. The development of gene-specific DNA barcodes for diagnostic and therapeutic applications requires a clear understanding of the evolutionary conservation and specificity of these genes across related species. Methods: Nucleotide sequences of nine major breast cancer-associated genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, TP53, CHEK2, CDH1, STK11, and BRIP1) were retrieved and analyzed. Orthologous sequences from primate species were identified with BLAST. Multiple sequence alignment was performed, followed by construction of phylogenetic trees using standard distance-based and maximum-likelihood approaches. Trees were visualized and compared to assess evolutionary relationships and gene-level specificity. Results: All analyzed genes demonstrated clear phylogenetic clustering, with Homo sapiens sequences grouping closely with primate orthologs, particularly Pan troglodytes and Gorilla. Highly conserved genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 showed tight clustering with short branch lengths, whereas moderate variability was observed in genes such as CHEK2 and BRIP1. No cross-gene clustering or unexpected lineage mixing was detected, supporting accurate gene annotation and specificity. Conclusion: The phylogenetic analyses confirm strong evolutionary conservation of key breast cancer susceptibility genes across primates. These findings support the reliability of gene-derived DNA barcode regions for diagnostic and therapeutic assay development and highlight the importance of evolutionary validation in barcode-based molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.