Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725280›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Large language model-based evaluation of the impact of gender in medical research.

Michael S Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael S YaoPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-6028

Funding

Trustworthy Machine Learning for Equitable HealthcareF30MD020264 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Steven Yu-Shuan Yao · 2024 to 2026
$147k
NIMHD NIH HHS F30 MD020264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Gender disparities in academic medicine have been previously reported, but prior analyses have relied on either manual labor or fixed databases of name-gender pairs that fail to generalize across different populations and cultures. The objective of this work is to evaluate the utility of large language models (LLMs) as a potential tool to facilitate systematic bibliometric analysis of academic research trends. Methods: We introduce an LLM-based pipeline that aggregates gender labels from multiple LLM instances to predict the genders of manuscript authors based on their first names. Results: Our proposed method outperforms alternative algorithms relying on lookup from finite databases of name-gender pairs, while also offering the scalability to tens of millions of authors that is unfeasible with other manual, human-based methods alone. Discussion and Conclusion: Our results suggest that LLMs can be a powerful tool to scalably track gender-based trends in academic medical research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebibliometricsgender disparitieslarge language modelsmedical research

Identifiers

PMID42725280
PMCPMC13561525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.