Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725323›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

Fedflow: cloud orchestration for federated learning with the FeatureCloud platform.

Lukas Weilguny, Niklas Probul, Yani Ren, Nicolas Pons, Jan Baumbach, Mathieu Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas WeilgunyUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, F-78350, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-0431
Niklas ProbulInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Yani RenUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, F-78350, France.
Nicolas PonsUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, F-78350, France.
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-0462
Mathieu AlmeidaUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, F-78350, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-0049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training on geographically distributed genomic and clinical datasets while complying with data privacy laws and regulatory constraints. FeatureCloud is an existing platform for FL that provides an accessible web-based interface and a large repository of implemented methods. However, due to its graphical interface, FeatureCloud requires manual interaction of all participants, limiting automation, iteration, and reproducibility. Results: We introduce fedflow, a Python-based command-line tool for headless orchestration of FL tasks with FeatureCloud. This tool uses distributed computing resources such as virtual machines or cloud instances to automate such workflows. This allows for scalable federated computing either in local simulations or deployed in a trusted environment. Further, we demonstrate how fedflow can be used to integrate FeatureCloud in reproducible Snakemake workflows. For this, we reanalyse a metagenomic dataset with two federated algorithms and compare the results to the centralized approach with pooled data. Overall, fedflow enables automation of multi-client FL tasks, facilitates embedding of FeatureCloud in standard bioinformatics pipelines and thereby helps increase reproducibility. Availability: Fedflow is open-source and available at https://github.com/W-L/fedflow.

Identifiers

PMID42725323
PMCPMC13561539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.