ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Implementation of a novel strategy to increase participation of Black and Hispanic people in parkinsonism research.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Black and Hispanic people are underrepresented in parkinsonism research leading to critical knowledge gaps and reduced quality of care. Methods: We developed a novel, comprehensive clinical registry in which research eligibility, interest, and participation are actively tracked for all patients at our site to reduce selection bias and streamline recruitment. We also implemented targeted approaches to reduce psychosocial and sociocultural barriers to research participation of Black and Hispanic people. We then performed a retrospective chart review to test the hypothesis that these combined strategies would be associated with racially/ethnically unbiased research recruitment. All follow-up patients with degenerative parkinsonism seen at the Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center over a 19-month period were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures were the approach and acceptance rates for CANPARK, a single-center prospective observational cohort study of American military veterans with parkinsonism. Results: During the study window, 197 parkinsonism patients were seen, 192 were eligible for CANPARK [ages 53-91; 96.4% male; 29.7% Hoehn and Yahr ≥4; 25.0% atypical parkinsonism], 167 (87.0% of eligible patients) were invited to participate (similar in all racial/ethnic groups), and 128 of 159 patients who made a decision whether to participate (80.5%) agreed to enroll. Acceptance rates were comparable in Black (79.4%; p = 0.92) or Hispanic (87.5%; p = 0.43) versus White (80.2%) patients. Conclusions: Using a novel, real-time clinical registry and targeted approaches, we achieved unbiased recruitment and high participation of Black and Hispanic patients in parkinsonism research. Future studies are needed to evaluate these approaches in other clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.