ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Reframing early gastric carcinogenesis through lineage, niche, and evolution.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early gastric cancer is still commonly conceptualized as the endpoint of a linear sequence from chronic gastritis to intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and invasion. Yet recent single-cell, spatial, genomic, and functional studies indicate that this model incompletely captures the biology of early gastric carcinogenesis. Malignant potential is established progressively within a precancerous gastric field already shaped by somatic evolution, chronic inflammatory injury, and epithelial lineage distortion. Within this field, progression is concentrated in a restricted set of precursor states, particularly incomplete, hybrid, and stem-like metaplastic populations that display plasticity, persistence, and increasing compatibility with a supportive microenvironment. Fibroblast niche remodeling, immune protection loss, endothelial rewiring, genomic instability, epigenetic drift, and selective retention of advantageous molecular alterations further promote malignant commitment. In parallel, diffuse gastric cancer appears to follow a distinct route that may arise independently of conventional intestinal metaplasia through E-cadherin-deficient epithelial transformation and downstream chromatin reprogramming. Here, we synthesize recent evidence to propose an updated framework for early gastric carcinogenesis based on field evolution, lineage instability, ecosystem support, and pathway divergence. Rather than replacing the classical Correa cascade, this framework seeks to refine it by shifting the unit of risk assessment from histologic stage alone to biologically defined precursor states shaped by lineage instability, clonal persistence, niche permissiveness, and pathway-specific molecular constraints. This perspective shifts the emphasis of prevention from detecting smaller cancers to identifying and intercepting biologically committed precursor states before invasion occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726149What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.