ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Rewiring Cellular Context as A Central Mechanism Governing Cancer Stem Cell Survival: Insights from ESC Comparisons.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive tumor initiation, metastasis, and therapy resistance, yet their remarkable persistence remains poorly understood. While CSCs share stemness attributes with embryonic stem cells (ESCs), including self-renewal, transcriptional plasticity, and permissive chromatin, they exhibit a fundamentally divergent regulatory logic that prioritizes survival over developmental fidelity. ESCs maintain globally open chromatin that supports transcriptional hyperactivity but predisposes them to apoptosis under genotoxic stress, whereas CSCs maintain dynamically inducible, permissive chromatin at survival loci while repressing differentiation programs, enabling adaptive stress responses. We advance the hypothesis that CSC persistence emerges not from any single factor, but from the integrative rewiring of signaling cascades (Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR), stress-responsive transcription factors (HIFs, NF-κB, STAT3), and core pluripotency networks (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG) within a survival-centric context, reinforced by dynamic chromatin remodeling, inducible super-enhancer landscapes, and microenvironmental cues (hypoxia, inflammation, matrix stiffness). Within this framework, the E2F family serves as a key contextual integrator: in ESCs, constitutive E2F activity triggers p53-mediated apoptosis upon DNA damage, preserving genomic integrity; in CSCs, deregulated E2F activity redirects transcription toward DNA repair, antioxidant defenses, and anti-apoptotic programs. This functional divergence underscores that phenotypic outcome is determined by the broader cellular and epigenetic landscape rather than any single factor. We conclude that CSC persistence is an emergent property of this integrated, survival-centric program, fundamentally distinct from the developmental imperative of ESCs. Effective therapeutic strategies must therefore move beyond targeting individual pathways to dismantle the interconnected regulatory networks that define the CSC survival context, offering a more robust approach to overcome therapy resistance and prevent tumor relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726169What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.