ReviewEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Disparities in treatment initiation following diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review.
Review in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early intervention improves long-term outcomes in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, disparities may exist in the timing of treatment initiation following diagnosis. The objective of this systematic review was to examine associations between sociodemographic factors and time to treatment initiation after ADHD diagnosis in children and adolescents. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to October 8, 2025. We included quantitative studies comparing time to ADHD treatment initiation after a diagnosis across sociodemographic groups, including sex, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance type, and geographic factors. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity between studies prevented meta-analysis. We narratively synthesized findings. Twelve out of 6,223 studies initially identified were included in the review. Seven studies reported on pharmacological treatment alone while four studies examined both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments; one study reported on psychosocial treatment alone. Sex was the most frequently assessed factor (N = 10 studies), with most studies reporting earlier treatment initiation among males compared with females (effect estimates ranged from 1.02 (95% CI 0.82-1.26) to 1.36 (95% CI 1.21-1.54)). Children from racial and ethnic minority groups, lower-income families, and rural areas generally experienced longer delays in treatment initiation. Findings varied by geographic region, and no consistent differences were observed by insurance type. Sociodemographic disparities persist in the timing of ADHD treatment initiation. These findings may inform strategies to promote equitable and timely ADHD care following diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726207What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.