ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Pelvic Dysfunction Composite Score (PDCS): A Pilot Study in Women with Endometriosis.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor dysfunctions are common in women with endometriosis. Currently available assessment tools are limited to isolated domains that do not allow for a comprehensive multidimensional evaluation. This study aimed to develop and perform a preliminary validation of a multidimensional composite index for pelvic floor dysfunction based on both subjective and objective measures in women with endometriosis.
methodsData were retrospectively analyzed from a previously established cohort of patients who received either medical or medical-surgical treatment for endometriosis. The PDCS comprises three domains (each transformed to a 0-100 scale): subjective anorectal dysfunction (Wexner constipation and incontinence scores), pelvic floor symptoms (PFDI-20), and objective anorectal function (manometric parameters). The score was calculated as the mean of the available domains and stratified into mild (0-33), moderate (34-66), and severe (67-100) dysfunction. Internal structure assessment was based on principal component analysis and Spearman correlations. Clinical validation was assessed by correlating with pain (EHP-30) and sexual function (FSFI).
resultsTwenty-nine patients with clinically relevant pelvic dysfunction were assessed [median PDCS 45.2 (IQR 33.3-60.6)]. Patients with a PDCS value of 0 were excluded from the validation analyses. There were no significant differences between treatment groups. PDCS correlated very well with PFDI-20, and moderately with the Wexner domain and manometric findings. The PDCS was significantly correlated with pain burden and sexual function.
conclusionsThe PDCS is a preliminary, multidimensional composite index that integrates symptom burden and anorectal functional findings in women with endometriosis. In the clinical setting, the proposed severity categories should therefore be regarded as exploratory and require validation in larger prospective cohorts before translating the results into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726219What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.