ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Probiotic Characterization and Anti-biofilm Activity of Ligilactobacillus salivarius: Implications for Periodontal Disease Management.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Porphyromonas gingivalis-driven periodontal disease is closely associated with pathogenic biofilm formation and oxidative stress-mediated tissue damage. This study evaluated the probiotic characteristics, antioxidant activity, and anti-biofilm effects of Ligilactobacillus salivarius and its cell-free supernatant (CFS). L. salivarius maintained growth under 0.8 mM H₂O₂, pH 5.0, and lysozyme exposure at 100 and 200 µg/mL, indicating tolerance to oxidative, acidic, and oral innate immune-related stresses. The strain showed an auto-aggregation rate of 56.6 ± 3.0% and co-aggregation rate with P. gingivalis of 46.7 ± 5.5%. Surface hydrophobicity was highest in chloroform (76.0 ± 3.0%), followed by ethyl acetate (39.1 ± 2.9%) and xylene (1.3 ± 0.9%). L. salivarius CFS exhibited strong antioxidant activity, with DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging rates of 87.1 ± 4.0% and 97.8 ± 1.0%, respectively, and a FRAP value of 1.30 ± 0.06 µM FeE/mL. The MIC of CFS against P. gingivalis was 20% (v/v), and the inhibition zone was 12.5 mm. CFS treatment also reduced P. gingivalis biofilm biomass and increased non-viable cells within biofilms. No significant cytotoxicity toward gingival epithelial cells were observed at 2.5-20% CFS. These findings suggest that L. salivarius CFS has probiotic-associated, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-biofilm potential in vitro, although further studies are required to identify active components and validate its periodontal protective effects in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726282What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.