ArticlePharmacological reports : PR2026
Drugs associated with retroperitoneal fibrosis: assessment of the 1969-2025 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pharmacovigilance database.
Article in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare fibroinflammatory disorder characterized by the development of fibrotic tissue around the abdominal aorta, often leading to ureteral entrapment and renal dysfunction. Several pharmacological agents have been implicated as potential triggers. Despite scattered case reports and limited series, comprehensive quantitative assessments of drug-related RPF signals remain scarce. This study aimed to identify and quantify signals of disproportionate reporting of RPF associated with specific medications using data from a large pharmacovigilance database.
methodsThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was queried from 1969 to 2025 to identify RPF-related adverse event reports. Drugs associated with more than twenty RPF reports were included in a disproportionality analysis; this threshold was arbitrarily defined to focus on medications with a relatively higher volume of reports. This selection aimed to ensure adequate statistical power and reduce noise from underreported associations. For each, the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), chi-square values, and p-values were calculated. A signal was considered statistically significant when PRR > 2, chi-square > 4, and p < 0.05. The total number of reports in the FAERS database was 30,668,520.
resultsA total of 1,013 RPF cases were identified. Of these, 392 (38.7%) were linked to eleven drugs, each associated with more than twenty RPF reports. Methysergide showed the strongest association (ROR: 5332.28; 95% CI: 4292.96-6623.21; PRR: 4604.65; chi-square: 429,546.30; p < 0.0001), followed by pergolide (ROR: 923.85; 95% CI: 686.60-1243.09; PRR: 897.76; chi-square: 40,148.64; p < 0.0001) and bromocriptine (ROR: 311.30; 95% CI: 224.78-431.13; PRR: 308.26; chi-square: 11,201.91; p < 0.0001). Several widely used medications such as bisoprolol, atenolol, and metformin also showed significant, though less pronounced, associations (p < 0.0001). The remaining drugs included etanercept, prednisone, rituximab, propranolol, and cyclophosphamide, all of which exhibited significant levels of disproportionate reporting (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThis pharmacovigilance analysis identified multiple medications, spanning different therapeutic classes, that demonstrated a disproportionate association with reports of RPF. Notably, some drugs with well-established safety profiles also emerged as potential signals, warranting increased clinical awareness. While this analysis reveals pharmacovigilance signals suggestive of drug-induced RPF, the observational nature of FAERS data limits causal inference. These findings underscore the need for further clinical research and mechanistic studies to better understand the etiopathogenic role of these agents in RPF development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726440What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.