ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
A Review of Modern Therapies and New Innovations in the Treatment of Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, with the skin being one of the most common and persistently affected organs in acute and chronic forms of the disease. Topical corticosteroids and supportive dermatologic care are foundational in mild cutaneous disease; however, moderate-to-severe disease frequently requires systemic corticosteroid therapy. Despite systemic corticosteroids being first-line therapy in moderate-to-severe disease, up to 60% of patients will develop steroid-refractory or steroid-resistant disease, emphasizing the need for alternative therapies. Recent advances in GVHD management have led to the introduction of targeted systemic agents, such as ruxolitinib, belumosudil, axatilimab, ibrutinib, and abatacept, each addressing different pathways implicated in disease pathogenesis and leading to incorporation into disease management based on established algorithms or select clinical contexts. Additionally, local immunomodulatory therapies, such as topical ruxolitinib, phototherapies, and extracorporeal photopheresis, can be utilized as adjunctive therapies for persistent or localized cutaneous disease. Cellular therapies, specifically mesenchymal stromal cells and regulatory T cells (Treg), are emerging therapies with promising potential in modulating the immune response and improving clinical outcomes. This review summarizes the current standards of care and recent therapeutic advances in the management of cutaneous GVHD, focusing on evidence-based therapies and skin-specific outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726447What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.