ReviewMolecular imaging and biology2026
Artificial Intelligence Across the Cancer Theranostics Workflow: Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Future Clinical Translation.
Review in Molecular imaging and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming cancer management and theranostics by improving the accuracy, efficiency, and personalization of diagnostic and therapeutic workflows. Routine and accurate clinical implementation of theranostics remains limited by complex dosimetry procedures, demanding imaging protocols, and challenges in quantitative image analysis. This review critically evaluates the role of AI throughout the cancer theranostic workflow, with a focus on its potential to address the key clinical and technical challenges that continue to limit the routine implementation of personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy. It examines the current maturity of AI applications, their readiness for clinical translation, and the future prospects. Recent advances in machine learning and deep learning have enabled automated image interpretation, enhanced quantitative imaging, accelerated acquisition protocols, single-time-point dosimetry, and supported radiomics and multi-omics analyses. Emerging concepts, such as theranostic digital twins, physics- and biology-informed neural networks, and explainable AI are also discussed as future directions for precision medicine. Despite substantial progress, challenges related to data quality, interpretability, ethics, privacy, standardization, and clinical validation continue to hinder widespread clinical adoption. Nevertheless, AI-driven technologies are expected to play a central role in advancing personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy and facilitating routine dosimetry-guided treatment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728548What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.