ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Cyber behaviour and personality nexus: clustering around security attitudes, FoMO, problematic social media use, and cognitive and personality traits?
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The serial mediating roles of protecting from risks and digital sharing in the relationship between self-control and the desire for being liked.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our research examines whether cyber behaviours can be classified through personality factors. The study involved 642 participants, including 314 from the United Kingdom (UK) and 328 from the Arab Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Using conscientiousness, neuroticism and need for cognition (NFC) along with problematic social media use (PSMU), fear of missing out (FoMO) and security attitude (SA), we identified three clusters in each cultural context, which showed broad similarities. To enhance interpretation, clusters were translated into behavioural personas. The UK personas were 'methodical achievers', 'reactive explorers' and 'engaged seekers', while the GCC personas were 'analytical protectors', 'reactive explorers' and 'hyper-connected defenders'. Developing these profiles and presenting them as visual personas was a central aim of the research. The clusters revealed consistent relationships between cyber behaviours and personal factors. High NFC and conscientiousness were linked to stronger SAs and lower PSMU and FoMO, whereas higher neuroticism predicted weaker SAs and elevated PSMU and FoMO. These findings underscore the utility of clustering approaches that integrate multiple behaviours rather than isolating one. By connecting personality with cyber tendencies, this study provides a foundation for personalized interventions, promoting cyber safety in a more comprehensive and culturally sensitive manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.