ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Clustering and classification of soybean leaves based on angle features.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Leaf shape is a genetically determined crop phenotype, and its accurate classification underpins soybean germplasm assessment and genetic improvement. Manual classification is highly subjective and struggles to distinguish morphologically similar leaves, while mainstream supervised classification demands large labeled datasets and incurs high development costs. Efficient feature frameworks for soybean leaf categorization are still insufficient. Methods: In this study, 581 biologically replicated terminal leaflets sampled from 194 soybean varieties were analyzed at the single-leaflet level using traditional morphological indices and novel leaf contour angular features. Unsupervised K-means clustering was used to classify soybean leaflet morphological phenotypes; t-SNE was applied exclusively for dimensional reduction visualization, while Welch's ANOVA combined with Games-Howell post-hoc tests was adopted to detect inter-cluster phenotypic differences. Clustering stability and external consistency against manual visual labeling were further quantified via Adjusted Rand Index to comprehensively verify the reliability of grouping outputs. Results: The results revealed no significant difference in leaflet edge complexity (p = 0.41) between two manually divided leaf groups distinguished by overall leaf outline similarity; these two morphologically similar leaf clusters failed to be fully separated even though the first two principal components accounted for 90.2% of total variance. For K-means clustering, k = 3 achieved better overall performance with a Calinski-Harabasz (CH) index of 395.55, Davies-Bouldin (DB) index of 1.03, and silhouette coefficient (SC) of 0.38, compared with k = 4. Nevertheless, the angular feature attained an F-value of 951.62 in driving sample reallocation across clusters, serving as the core indicator for fine subdivision at k = 4. Under k = 4 clustering, all six morphological indices differed significantly among the four groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, the number of cross-clustered samples increased from 66 to 119 as k rose from 3 to 4, with 96.6% of cross-clustering attributed to the leaflet contour angular feature. Discussion: This research provides a novel reference and technical support for the automated identification and fine classification of soybean leaf morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.