Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Clustering and classification of soybean leaves based on angle features.

Haodong Chen, Yanjun Zhang, Haochong Chen, Guangyao Sun, Guanzhou Wu, Fengfeng Liu, Xianfeng Yang, Yuntao Ma, Xingrong Wang, Weiyang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haodong ChenCollege of Agriculture, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Yanjun ZhangInstitute of Crop, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Haochong ChenCollege of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Guangyao SunCollege of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Guanzhou WuCollege of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fengfeng LiuCollege of Agriculture, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Xianfeng YangInstitute of Crop, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yuntao MaCollege of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xingrong WangInstitute of Crop, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Weiyang LiuCollege of Agriculture, Tarim University, Alar, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Leaf shape is a genetically determined crop phenotype, and its accurate classification underpins soybean germplasm assessment and genetic improvement. Manual classification is highly subjective and struggles to distinguish morphologically similar leaves, while mainstream supervised classification demands large labeled datasets and incurs high development costs. Efficient feature frameworks for soybean leaf categorization are still insufficient. Methods: In this study, 581 biologically replicated terminal leaflets sampled from 194 soybean varieties were analyzed at the single-leaflet level using traditional morphological indices and novel leaf contour angular features. Unsupervised K-means clustering was used to classify soybean leaflet morphological phenotypes; t-SNE was applied exclusively for dimensional reduction visualization, while Welch's ANOVA combined with Games-Howell post-hoc tests was adopted to detect inter-cluster phenotypic differences. Clustering stability and external consistency against manual visual labeling were further quantified via Adjusted Rand Index to comprehensively verify the reliability of grouping outputs. Results: The results revealed no significant difference in leaflet edge complexity (p = 0.41) between two manually divided leaf groups distinguished by overall leaf outline similarity; these two morphologically similar leaf clusters failed to be fully separated even though the first two principal components accounted for 90.2% of total variance. For K-means clustering, k = 3 achieved better overall performance with a Calinski-Harabasz (CH) index of 395.55, Davies-Bouldin (DB) index of 1.03, and silhouette coefficient (SC) of 0.38, compared with k = 4. Nevertheless, the angular feature attained an F-value of 951.62 in driving sample reallocation across clusters, serving as the core indicator for fine subdivision at k = 4. Under k = 4 clustering, all six morphological indices differed significantly among the four groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, the number of cross-clustered samples increased from 66 to 119 as k rose from 3 to 4, with 96.6% of cross-clustering attributed to the leaflet contour angular feature. Discussion: This research provides a novel reference and technical support for the automated identification and fine classification of soybean leaf morphology.

Indexed as

angle featureK-meansleaf shape classificationmachine visionsoybean

Identifiers

PMID42729264
PMCPMC13562022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.