ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
From technological closed-loop to human-machine trust: a systematic review of ethical and communication challenges of brain-computer interface in elderly care.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the global population ages, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have emerged as a promising technological pathway for restoring communication, motor function, and cognitive support in elderly care settings. However, the ethical and communication challenges accompanying BCI deployment in these contexts remain insufficiently understood. This systematic review identified 177 studies meeting the inclusion criteria from 12,423 records. Through comprehensive analysis, six core ethical themes were identified: privacy and data security, informed consent and autonomy, personhood and identity, technical risks and safety, equity and accessibility, and risk-benefit trade-offs. Beyond cataloging these ethical challenges, this review proposes a three-level analytical framework encompassing human-computer interaction, interpersonal communication, and public opinion dissemination to examine how ethical risks manifest as communication breakdowns across the closed-loop BCI process of neural signal acquisition, intention decoding, and external feedback. Furthermore, a three-dimensional mapping integrating ethical issues, communication challenges, and application scenarios (rehabilitation assistance, communication assistance, monitoring and prevention, and emotional support) is constructed to reveal scenario-specific ethical configurations. The findings indicate that BCI's ethical risks are not peripheral but structurally embedded in the technology's interaction logic-decoding uncertainty can translate into care misjudgment, neural data inferability extends privacy risks beyond information leakage to psychological exposure and power asymmetry, and technology-mediated communication creates structural tensions in trust and responsibility. The review concludes that responsible BCI deployment in elderly care requires not merely algorithmic improvement but the systematic engineering of ethical principles into care processes, including uncertainty disclosure at the interface level, data minimization and layered informed consent at the institutional level, and interdisciplinary collaboration with long-term support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.