ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Real-world anti-amyloid therapy beyond traditional symptomatic populations: a longitudinal case series.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are approved as disease-modifying therapies for early Alzheimer's disease (AD), but real-world evidence remains limited, particularly among individuals treated during preclinical or minimally symptomatic stages. This study characterized clinical and biomarker trajectories among anti-amyloid therapy recipients across disease stages. Method: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective case series of three biomarker-positive individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who received lecanemab or donanemab. Clinical, cognitive, cerebrospinal fluid, plasma biomarker, and amyloid PET data were examined. Results: In all three cases, most of the observation period preceded anti-amyloid therapy initiation. Clinical trajectories varied by biomarker profile and treatment timing. Two participants received donanemab while cognitively normal or at an early transitional stage despite persistent amyloid- and tau-positive profiles. One participant received lecanemab after clinically significant impairment emerged. Cases 1 and 2 showed prolonged preservation of cognitive and functional performance despite sustained AD biomarker abnormalities and amyloid PET positivity. In case 2, age- and education-adjusted Wechsler Logical Memory testing detected progression to mild cognitive impairment despite preserved Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating scores. In contrast, case 3 showed persistent cognitive impairment and progression toward mild dementia. Conclusion: This case series illustrates substantial heterogeneity among real-world anti-amyloid therapy recipients. Persistent biomarker abnormalities may precede clinical decline for years, especially among highly educated individuals with substantial cognitive reserve. Conventional global screening tools may underestimate early decline and affect treatment eligibility decisions. Although not generalizable, these observations underscore the need for larger real-world studies characterizing clinical trajectories following anti-amyloid therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.