ArticlePhotoacoustics2026
Real-time quality control in optoacoustic mesoscopy for enhancing data quality and standardization in clinical studies.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raster scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM) has matured as a medical imaging modality that enables unique high-resolution visualization of optical contrast at depths of several millimeters. Compared with other optical methods, optoacoustics is less affected by photon scattering, enabling superior imaging of dermatological, cardiometabolic, and other conditions. A critical requirement for clinical adoption is the development of methodology that ensures quality control and standardization across subjects, time points, and acquisition environments. We present a machine-learning-based automated real-time quality control method for RSOM using signal-derived metrics for noise and motion. The model was trained and evaluated on 1725 clinical RSOM scans benchmarked against visually perceived image quality ratings from eight experts. The method enables real-time feedback during acquisition to identify suboptimal scans and support standardized high-quality data acquisition. We discuss the impact of the method on clinical RSOM deployment, and the cost benefits achieved through data standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.