ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026
Progress and challenges in exploring the pathogenesis of depressive disorders via RNA sequencing.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depressive disorders (DD) are highly heterogeneous psychiatric illnesses. Their complex pathogenesis, coupled with suboptimal response rates to current clinical treatments, poses significant challenges to global mental health. High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of DD at the transcriptomic level. This paper reviews recent advances utilizing bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), and single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) to explore the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder (MDD), perinatal depression (PND), perimenopausal depression (PMD), and post-stroke depression (PSD). Current evidence indicates that immune-inflammatory activation, impaired synaptic plasticity, and mitochondrial energy metabolism dysfunction constitute shared core pathological mechanisms across these disorders, validating classical pathogenic hypotheses at the molecular level. Furthermore, distinct clinical subtypes exhibit significant transcriptomic heterogeneity; for instance, MDD shows marked sexual dimorphism and immunophenotypic characteristics. Specific molecular pathways also distinguish different DD categories: PND and PMD mainly involve imbalances in neuroendocrine-immune interaction networks driven by hormonal fluctuations, whereas PSD is characterized by the interaction between innate immune responses and autophagy flux impairment. Although RNA-seq has significantly advanced our understanding of DD, challenges such as restricted sample sources, high data heterogeneity, and insufficient clinical translation remain. Future research should prioritize single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to resolve tissue heterogeneity, promote multi-omics integration to construct causal regulatory networks, and strengthen cross-species comparative studies. These efforts will accelerate the development of precision diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.