ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Context-dependent interactions between variable-loop pulsed field ablation and cardiac implantable electronic devices: a controlled preclinical study.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used for atrial fibrillation and is being extended beyond pulmonary vein isolation to right atrial (RA) and superior vena cava (SVC) targets. As its use expands, interactions with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have become an important yet incompletely defined safety concern. We aimed to evaluate context-dependent interactions between PFA and diverse CIED systems in a controlled pre-clinical model. Methods and results: Thirteen swine underwent implantation of contemporary CIED systems. Seven animals received PFA across multiple device configurations, including dual-chamber pacemakers, transvenous ICD/CRT-D generator systems with single- or dual-coil ICD leads, a leadless ventricular pacemaker, and a subcutaneous ICD. Six control animals underwent catheter manipulation without energy delivery. PFA was performed in the left atrium (LA), RA, and SVC, including applications near transvenous leads and pre-specified delivery over exposed SVC defibrillator coils. Device parameters were assessed sequentially. Results: When performed at an anatomical distance from device components, LA-PFA was not associated with critical device dysfunction under the studied conditions, although minor parameter changes occurred in a minority of cases, particularly with septal atrial lead positioning. During RA/SVC procedures, parameter perturbations and atrial lead dislodgement were observed and were most consistent with catheter-lead mechanical interaction. PFA delivered overexposed ICD coils that produced localized electrical changes without evidence of acute global device failure. The leadless ventricular pacemaker and subcutaneous ICD maintained stable function. Conclusion: PFA did not cause catastrophic CIED dysfunction under the studied conditions; however, device-PFA interactions were strongly context-dependent, influenced by anatomical proximity, conductive exposure, and mechanical interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.