ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2026
Repurposing antimicrobial agents for neuroprotection: Mechanisms, clinical potential, and challenges.
Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial agents, originally developed for infectious diseases, have become attractive candidates for repurposing in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases owing to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and neuroprotective activities. In this review, we critically examine the therapeutic potential of selected antimicrobial classes, including tetracyclines (e.g., minocycline), macrolides (e.g., azithromycin), antimalarial agents (e.g., chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine), sulfones (e.g., dapsone), and antiparasitic agents (e.g., ivermectin), in non-infectious neurological diseases. We performed a narrative review of pre-clinical and clinical studies to investigate the effects of these agents on the main neuropathological mechanisms, such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, and gut-brain axis dysregulation. The available evidence suggests that many of the antimicrobial agents have beneficial effects in a number of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, stroke, and traumatic brain injury. These agents have been shown to modulate microglia activation, to inhibit production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and to alter intracellular signaling pathways, including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells. Furthermore, by reshaping the gut microbiota, antimicrobials modulate immune signaling, alter neurotransmitter levels, and compromise blood-brain barrier integrity-thereby positioning the gut-brain axis as central to their mechanism of action. Repurposing antimicrobial agents is a pragmatic and novel approach to treat complex neurological disorders with available approved drugs. Despite the encouraging evidence, we must carefully manage challenges such as antimicrobial resistance, off-target effects, and regulatory considerations. Further well-designed clinical trials are essential to validate their long-term safety and efficacy in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.