Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730097›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2026

Preoperative fasting guidelines: A narrative review.

Maud De Meyer, Carolina S Romero, Marc Van de Velde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maud De MeyerFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MDM), Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Outcomes Research Consortium, Houston, Texas, United States of America (CsR) and the Department of Anaesthesiology and the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, UZ Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MVdV).
Carolina S RomeroFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MDM), Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Outcomes Research Consortium, Houston, Texas, United States of America (CsR) and the Department of Anaesthesiology and the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, UZ Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MVdV).
Marc Van de VeldeFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MDM), Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Outcomes Research Consortium, Houston, Texas, United States of America (CsR) and the Department of Anaesthesiology and the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, UZ Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (MVdV).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative fasting has long been a cornerstone of perioperative care, primarily aimed at minimising the risk of pulmonary aspiration during anaesthesia. The historical 'nil per os from midnight' policy, once universally adopted, has undergone considerable re-evaluation in recent decades. Growing evidence supporting the safety of shorter fasting intervals, particularly for clear liquids, have led to the revision of fasting guidelines worldwide. Despite these updated recommendations, prolonged preoperative fasting remains common in clinical practice. Contributing factors include outdated protocols, miscommunication, logistical constraints, operating room scheduling, too low priority and variability in guideline implementation. Such practices not only diminish patient comfort but may also lead to metabolic disturbances, with children being especially susceptible. This narrative review explores the rationale, evolution, and current guidelines surrounding preoperative fasting. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, such as the use of gastric ultrasound, rapid sequence induction, and gastric tubes, are discussed. The emerging impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is also highlighted. By synthesising current evidence, this review aims to provide clinicians with a practical, evidence-based framework for optimising fasting practices and improving perioperative outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID42730097
PMCPMC13568165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.