Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730152›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Development and

V M Prajapati, Abhijit Deb Choudhury, Anuj Kumar, Manisha Rathore, Gargi Sharma, Tavishi Singh, Tara Singh Farswan, Ayushman Singh, Ramakrishna Rayiti, Shovan Ghosh and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

V M PrajapatiDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0587-2532
Abhijit Deb ChoudhuryDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anuj KumarDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manisha RathoreLaboratory Animal Facility, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gargi SharmaDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tavishi SinghDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tara Singh FarswanDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ayushman SinghDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ramakrishna RayitiDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shovan GhoshDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rohit KumarDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajdeep GuhaLaboratory Animal Facility, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aravind Singh KshatriDivision of Neuroscience and Ageing Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rabi Sankar BhattaDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
A B PantDepartment Systems Toxicology & Health Risk Assessment, Indian Institute of Toxicology and Research, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
S K RathDivision of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a heterogeneous disorder with limited therapeutic options, is often complicated by drug-induced nephrotoxicity from aminoglycosides, such as gentamicin (GM). Nintedanib (NTD), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties, holds promise but is limited by poor solubility, low bioavailability, and potential systemic toxicity. To overcome these challenges, a nintedanib nanosuspension polymer (NTD-PNP) was developed using polycaprolactone (PCL) to improve solubility, control drug release, and maximize oral bioavailability. Physicochemical classification confirmed spherical, smooth-surfaced nanoparticles with particle sizes of 106.5-154.7 nm, ζ-potential of -1.39 to +8.86 mV, polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.139-0.384, entrapment efficiency of 28.92-70.92%, and drug loading of 19.94-47.28%. Compared with the free drug, NTD-PNPs displayed superior solubility and prolonged release kinetics. The therapeutic efficacy of NTD-PNPs was evaluated for 28 days in a gentamicin-induced CKD rat model (100 mg/kg, 21 days). Treatment with NTD-PNPs significantly reduced blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels, indicating improved renal function. Immunohistochemical analysis further revealed downregulation of fibronectin, α-SMA, Smad3, and collagen III expression, and histopathology showed a reduction in tubular degeneration, extracellular matrix accumulation, and fibrosis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that NTD-PNPs enhance the therapeutic index of nintedanib, offering a promising sustained-release nano formulation to mitigate CKD progression.

Identifiers

PMID42730152
PMCPMC13563935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.