ReviewRadiologia brasileira
Evaluation of a radiomics workflow in chest CT: a pilot study of lung lesion segmentation, feature extraction, and clustering.
Review in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a radiomics workflow applied to chest computed tomography (CT), examining its feasibility and performance across the steps of lung lesion segmentation, feature extraction, and clustering, as well as exploring its potential to distinguish between benign and malignant lung lesions. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study including CT images of 32 histopathology-confirmed lesions (11 benign; 21 malignant). Lesions were segmented by using syngo.via Frontier Radiomics software, af-ter which > 900 radiomic features were extracted with the same software. Data processing-including normal-ization, dimensionality reduction (principal component analysis), and unsupervised (k-means) clustering-was conducted in Python. Results: The best clustering solution was obtained with a k = 2 (silhouette score = 0.4668), effectively separating benign lesions, which exhibited low heterogeneity, from malignant lesions, which exhibited complex patterns of texture and shape. Conclusion: The application of a radiomics workflow proved feasible and potentially useful for differentiating between benign and malignant lung lesions on CT, underscoring its value as a complementary tool in thoracic oncology. How-ever, future studies using multicenter datasets, blinded evaluations, and more structured integration environments are warranted in order to support clinical validation and prototyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.