ArticleACS omega2026
Optimizing Electrical Stimulation Parameters to Enhance Viability of Dental Pulp Stem Cells in Graphene-Based Scaffolds.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering (TE) combines cells, biomaterials, and external regulatory cues to support tissue repair and regeneration. Graphene-based scaffolds are promising TE platforms because they combine electrical conductivity, mechanical reinforcement, and cytocompatible surface properties. When paired with electrical stimulation (ES), these scaffolds may provide an electroactive microenvironment that influences stem cell behavior. However, suitable ES conditions for dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) cultured on graphene-based scaffolds remain insufficiently defined. This study examined how different electric field (EF) intensities affect DPSC viability and cytotoxicity on graphene oxide/sodium alginate (GOSA) and reduced graphene oxide/sodium alginate (rGOSA) scaffolds. Three-dimensional scaffolds were prepared by freeze-drying, coated with poly-l-lysine (PLL), seeded with DPSCs, and stimulated using a custom Ti mesh electrode bioreactor. EF intensities from 0 to 500 mV mm
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.