Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730469›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2026

Application Progress of Machine Learning in Prognostic Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Jian Chen, Lu Huan Shen, Peng Fei Xia, Ke Qiang Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Lanxi, Zhejiang 321100, China.
Lu Huan ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Lanxi, Zhejiang 321100, China.
Peng Fei XiaDepartment of Cardiology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Lanxi, Zhejiang 321100, China.
Ke Qiang XuDepartment of Cardiology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Lanxi, Zhejiang 321100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a cornerstone treatment for coronary artery disease; however, accurate prognostic prediction remains a significant clinical challenge. Machine learning technologies demonstrate tremendous potential in PCI prognostic prediction by analyzing vast amounts of clinical data and identifying complex nonlinear relationships among variables. This article systematically reviews recent advances in machine learning applications for PCI prognostic prediction, encompassing predictive targets including in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, bleeding complications, and long-term survival. Algorithms such as random forest, support vector machines, neural networks, and deep learning have demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to traditional risk scoring systems across multiple studies. Deep learning approaches exhibit particular advantages in processing multimodal data. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain regarding model interpretability, external validation, and clinical implementation. Future research should prioritize the development of explainable artificial intelligence systems, the conduct of multicenter validation studies, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks for clinical deployment.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCardiovascular diseaseMachine learningPercutaneous coronary interventionPrognostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID42730469
PMCPMC13568772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.