Green Extraction Approach for Phenolic-Rich Peppermint Extracts Using Ultrasound: Impact of Solvent and Time Variables.

Kantapon Premprayoon, Tossapol Jangnoi, Likit Temprom, Khakhanang Ratananikom

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kantapon PremprayoonDepartment of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Khon Kaen Campus, Khon Kaen, Thailand, rmuti.ac.th.

Tossapol JangnoiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Khon Kaen Campus, Khon Kaen, Thailand, rmuti.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0315-9895

Likit TempromDepartment of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Khon Kaen Campus, Khon Kaen, Thailand, rmuti.ac.th.

Khakhanang RatananikomDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin, Thailand, ksu.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-1471

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation FF68/KKC/043

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of solvent composition and sonication time on the ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic-rich peppermint extracts using ethanol-water mixtures. Ethanol concentrations of 0%, 50%, 75%, and 95% were applied for extraction periods of 15 and 30 min, and the resulting extracts were evaluated for total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using DPPH and ABTS assays. Two-way ANOVA revealed that ethanol concentration, sonication time, and their interaction significantly affected all measured parameters (p < 0.01). The optimal extraction condition was 50% ethanol for 15 min, which produced the highest TPC (141.64 ± 3.34 mg GAE/g extract) and TFC (256.20 ± 2.43 mg RE/g extract), together with the strongest antioxidant activities, as indicated by the lowest IC

Indexed as

Green Chemistry TechnologyMentha piperitaPhenolsPlant ExtractsSolventsSonicationAntioxidantsBenzothiazolesEthanolFlavonoidsTime FactorsAntioxidantsBenzothiazolesEthanolFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant ExtractsSolventsantioxidant activitygreen extractionMentha piperita L.phenolic compoundsultrasound-assisted extraction

Identifiers

PMID42730611

DOI10.1155/tswj/4620252

PMCPMC13570449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.