ArticleEndocrine pathology2026
Divergent c-MYC Expression Patterns in NET and NEC: Insights from a Multicentre Cohort of 1380 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) comprise well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), whose distinction is clinically critical. Although c-MYC alterations have been implicated in NEC pathogenesis, c-MYC expression across NEC subtypes and anatomical sites, as well as in NET, remains incompletely defined. We analysed c-MYC immunohistochemically in 1380 resected NEN using the Immunoreactive Score (IRS: negative 0-1, weak 2-3, moderate 4-8, strong 9-12). Overall, c-MYC positivity (IRS ≥ 2) was observed in 13.3% of NEN. Expression was detected in 43% of NEC (164/381), including strong staining in 19.4%, whereas it was rare in NET and pulmonary carcinoids (20/999; 2%; p ≤ 0.001). Within NEC, c-MYC expression was enriched in LCNEC and MiNEN compared with SCNEC and Merkel cell carcinoma (p ≤ 0.001) and occurred more often in gastroenteropancreatic than in pulmonary NEC (57.6% vs. 37.3%; p ≤ 0.001). Among NET, G3 tumours showed the highest positivity rate (6/35; 17.1%), although this was significantly lower than in NEC (p ≤ 0.001), with strong expression observed in only one NET G3 (2.9%). No association between c-MYC expression and survival was identified in either NEC or NET. Our study confirms c-MYC expression as a common event in NEC and highlights differences across histological subtypes and anatomical sites, while demonstrating its absence in most low-proliferative NET. A subset of NET G3 tumours exhibits weak to moderate c-MYC expression at levels far below those seen in NEC, suggesting that strong c-MYC positivity may support a NEC classification in borderline cases but does not represent a definitive discriminatory marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.