Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730951›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2026

Divergent c-MYC Expression Patterns in NET and NEC: Insights from a Multicentre Cohort of 1380 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Maxime Schmitt, Katharina Ofner, Detlef Klaus Bartsch, Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Anja Rinke, Thomas Gress, Marcus Kremer, Matthias Evert, Nic G Reitsam, Viktorie Koberova and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Maxime SchmittInstitute of Pathology, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35043, Germany.
Katharina OfnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Detlef Klaus BartschDepartment of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular-Surgery, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Daniel-Christoph WagnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anja RinkeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Thomas GressDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Marcus KremerInstitute of Pathology, Städtisches Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Matthias EvertInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Nic G ReitsamPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Viktorie KoberovaPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Bruno MärklPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Markus EcksteinInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Konrad SteinestelInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Department XIII, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Axel PagenstecherInstitute of Neuropathology, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ursula KeberInstitute of Neuropathology, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35043, Germany.
Katja SteigerDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian FoerschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Günter KlöppelDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Atsuko KasajimaDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hanibal BohnenbergerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Marburg University and University Medical Centre Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35043, Germany. moritz.jesinghaus@uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) comprise well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), whose distinction is clinically critical. Although c-MYC alterations have been implicated in NEC pathogenesis, c-MYC expression across NEC subtypes and anatomical sites, as well as in NET, remains incompletely defined. We analysed c-MYC immunohistochemically in 1380 resected NEN using the Immunoreactive Score (IRS: negative 0-1, weak 2-3, moderate 4-8, strong 9-12). Overall, c-MYC positivity (IRS ≥ 2) was observed in 13.3% of NEN. Expression was detected in 43% of NEC (164/381), including strong staining in 19.4%, whereas it was rare in NET and pulmonary carcinoids (20/999; 2%; p ≤ 0.001). Within NEC, c-MYC expression was enriched in LCNEC and MiNEN compared with SCNEC and Merkel cell carcinoma (p ≤ 0.001) and occurred more often in gastroenteropancreatic than in pulmonary NEC (57.6% vs. 37.3%; p ≤ 0.001). Among NET, G3 tumours showed the highest positivity rate (6/35; 17.1%), although this was significantly lower than in NEC (p ≤ 0.001), with strong expression observed in only one NET G3 (2.9%). No association between c-MYC expression and survival was identified in either NEC or NET. Our study confirms c-MYC expression as a common event in NEC and highlights differences across histological subtypes and anatomical sites, while demonstrating its absence in most low-proliferative NET. A subset of NET G3 tumours exhibits weak to moderate c-MYC expression at levels far below those seen in NEC, suggesting that strong c-MYC positivity may support a NEC classification in borderline cases but does not represent a definitive discriminatory marker.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineNeuroendocrine TumorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycC-MYCNeuroendocrine carcinomaNeuroendocrine neoplasmsNeuroendocrine tumour

Identifiers

PMID42730951
PMCPMC13570926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.