ArticleBMJ open2026
Barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors: a scoping review based on the theoretical domains framework.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo synthesise barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behaviour among stroke survivors and map them to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
designA scoping review conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Nine electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and WanFang) were searched from inception to May 2025. Grey literature was identified through Google Scholar and ProQuest. Updated research was conducted in July 2026. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies focusing on barriers and/or facilitators to sedentary behaviour among stroke survivors were included, with no restrictions on study design. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and mapped identified barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Frequencies of domains were calculated to summarise distribution patterns.
results49 studies were included. A total of 32 barriers and 17 facilitators were identified and mapped to 12 TDF domains. Barriers were reported more frequently than facilitators. The most frequently represented domains included Skills, Environmental Context and Resources, Beliefs about Capabilities, Beliefs about Consequences, Social Influences, Knowledge and Emotion. Common barriers included stroke-related physical and functional limitations, fatigue, inadequate knowledge, low self-efficacy, fear of falling, limited social support and environmental constraints. Key facilitators included sedentary behaviour education, higher self-efficacy, supportive social and physical environments, inpatient rehabilitation and behaviour change strategies that promoted more active lifestyles.
conclusionsBarriers to reducing sedentary behaviour among stroke survivors include limited knowledge, low motivation, insufficient social support, negative emotions and beliefs and physical limitations. Facilitators include social support, positive beliefs and supportive environmental conditions. Future interventions should comprehensively address these multilevel factors to develop more tailored and feasible behaviour change strategies. REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered with the Open Science Framework website (osf.io/ma8qp).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.