ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026
To Prune or to Protect: Complement-Mediated Microglial Synaptic Pruning as a Therapeutic Target in Neuropathic Pain.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropathic pain affects approximately 7-10% of the general population, yet available pharmacological treatments remain largely inadequate. Central sensitization in the spinal dorsal horn, partially driven by microglia-mediated synaptic remodeling, constitutes a core yet incompletely characterized mechanism underlying this disorder. Following peripheral nerve injury, spinal microglia engulf and eliminate dorsal horn synapses via a complement-dependent pathway reactivated from a developmental pruning program; this pathway exhibits preferential selectivity for inhibitory relative to excitatory synaptic subtypes. This process is positively regulated by the LXR-ApoE-C1q transcriptional axis, the Spi1-Clec7a axis, and an emerging phosphatidylserine-dependent "eat-me" signal, and is negatively modulated by the endogenous ganglioside GT1b. The selective elimination of glycinergic inputs onto PKCγ interneurons drives disinhibition of spinal nociceptive circuits, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of mechanical allodynia. Pharmacological inhibition of C1q, microglia-specific ApoE knockdown, and intrathecal Spi1 silencing each attenuate pain hypersensitivity in preclinical rodent models, which have been conducted predominantly in male subjects. However, a causal link between structural synapse loss and specific pain phenotypes has been definitively established only for the PKCγ circuit. Furthermore, the generalizability of these findings to female animals, non-mechanical neuropathic pain subtypes, and human disease remains unvalidated. This review synthesizes current evidence on microglia-synapse interactions in neuropathic pain, applies an explicit levels-of-evidence framework to distinguish direct empirical findings from inferential conclusions, critically evaluates sex as a biological variable across this signaling pathway, delineates key translational gaps, and presents a mechanistic framework to guide the development of disease-modifying analgesic strategies targeting the microglia-synapse interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42732533What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.