ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Mapping the landscape of Chinese patent medicines in breast cancer: a multi-database bibliometric analysis (1991-2025).
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer imposes a significant healthcare burden. Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) are widely used as complementary therapy in cancer care. This study is aimed at comprehensively reviewing the application of CPMs, identifying research hotspots, and identifying CPMs that are promising candidates for further clinical evaluation in breast cancer.
methodsWe searched Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang, and CQVIP databases. Data were preprocessed using Co-Occurrence 20.5 and analyzed with CiteSpace and R software.
resultsA total of 1847 publications were included, with annual growth concentrated in mainland China. Among the top ten CPMs with the highest volume of research, most had received recommendations from at least one guideline, though recommendations sometimes diverged from package inserts, which often lacked explicit tumor indications. Compared with studies in Chinese databases, research in English databases tended to focus more on CPMs that were prepared or purified from only one or two herbals, with clearly identified primary active ingredients and botanical origins. Research in this field primarily focused on the tumor microenvironment and on reducing toxicity while enhancing efficacy in conventional antitumor therapies, which represented key trends for future studies. Currently, herbal polysaccharides appear to be gaining attention and academic influence within the field.
conclusionsThere is a discrepancy between the actual clinical application of CPMs and their usage standards. It is necessary to improve their scientific and standardization development by clarifying drug mechanisms and value, which requires high-quality evidence. In the future, more cross-regional and multiethnic studies should be conducted to validate their universal applicability and safety, which are topics that require further investigation before any broader use can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42733097What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.