ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Systemic Sclerosis: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by immune dysfunction, vasculopathy, and progressive fibrosis, yet current therapies rarely address these pathogenic axes simultaneously. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy has gained increasing interest as a disease-modifying strategy because its therapeutic activity appears to depend largely on paracrine signaling rather than durable engraftment. Through these mechanisms, mesenchymal stem cells may suppress profibrotic fibroblast activation, recalibrate innate and adaptive immune responses, and enhance vascular repair. Cell-free approaches, particularly extracellular vesicles and exosome-based therapeutics, are further expanding the translational potential of this field by offering scalable alternatives to live cell administration. Early clinical studies of systemic infusion and local delivery for complications such as hand dysfunction (reduced grip strength, joint contracture, and impaired fine motor function) and digital vasculopathy have demonstrated feasibility, acceptable short-term safety, and encouraging signals in skin and vascular outcomes. Nevertheless, long term clinical benefit remains uncertain because published studies are few and heterogeneous in cell source, manufacturing and expansion protocols, dose, route, concomitant therapy, and endpoint selection. Progress in this area will require standardized potency frameworks, improved control of senescence and functional drift, phenotype-specific trial stratification, and harmonized outcome hierarchies across vascular and cutaneous domains. Integration of immune and vascular biomarkers as pharmacodynamic readouts, together with multicenter randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up, will be essential for defining efficacy and advancing targeted cell-free therapeutic platforms in systemic sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734780What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.