ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2026
Understanding tumor adaptations and resistance to MET inhibitors in MET-altered non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimType Ib MET inhibitors are clinically active in selected MET-altered non-small cell lung cancer, particularly tumors with MET exon 14 skipping or MET amplification, but acquired resistance remains incompletely understood. Here, we investigated resistance across biologically distinct MET-altered contexts, including MET exon 14 skipping, MET amplification, and MET overexpression.
methodsPaired baseline and progression samples from seven patients treated with tepotinib or capmatinib were analyzed using spatial transcriptomics, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, CRISPR screening, and drug-combination assays. Patient-derived cultures and resistant cell-line models were used to explore resistance-associated changes.
resultsMET inhibitor resistance was heterogeneous, with persistence of the initial MET alteration in most evaluable cases and emergence of patient-specific genomic events. Three main resistance-associated, often overlapping, routes were identified: on-target MET evolution through kinase-domain alterations; extracellular matrix and tumor-microenvironment remodeling, including collagen and fibronectin upregulation, complement-related signaling, and partial EMT-associated programs; and bypass signaling involving EGFR/HER, MAPK, and PI3K/Akt pathways. In vitro models reproduced several tumor-cell-intrinsic features but only partially captured microenvironment-associated changes.
conclusionsMET inhibitor resistance in this cohort involved overlapping, context-dependent genomic, phenotypic, and signaling adaptations, supporting combination strategies for MET-altered lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.