ArticleMedicine2026
Clinical features and factors associated with emergency department transfer among outpatients.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unplanned emergency department (ED) transfer from outpatient clinics represents an important escalation point that may reflect early physiological deterioration and limited ambulatory capacity for monitoring and urgent interventions. We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study of consecutive adult outpatients treated at our institution between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2024. Cases were outpatients requiring ED transfer during or shortly after the index outpatient encounter, confirmed by transfer documentation and same-day ED registration. Controls were outpatients discharged without ED transfer and were selected using 1:1 matching by outpatient department/specialty, calendar time of visit, sex, and age within 5 years. The final analytic cohort included 2184 cases and 2184 matched controls (4368 patients); 106 encounters were excluded based on prespecified criteria. Abnormal vital signs (35.1%) and cardiopulmonary symptoms (30.3%) were the most common primary indications for ED transfer. Compared with controls, cases exhibited higher temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure and lower SpO2. In multivariable logistic regression, variables independently associated with ED transfer included shorter symptom duration, cardiopulmonary or infection-related presenting complaints, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary disease, and acute physiological derangements, particularly higher temperature and respiratory rate, lower peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), elevated systolic blood pressure, and altered mental status. These findings indicate that ED transfer from outpatient settings was associated primarily with objective markers of acute instability and selected comorbidity profiles. Causal inference or direct use as a prospective decision rule should not be drawn from this retrospective case-control analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.