ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Analysis of Volatile Components Changes in Horse Fat During Dry Fractionation by E-Nose, HS/GC-IMS and SPME/GC-MS.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Horse fat is a valuable lipid source for traditional meat products, but its flavor quality is remains unclear during processing conditions. To investigate the effect of dry fractionation on the volatile profile of refined horse fat, samples obtained at different temperature were analyzed using an E-nose, HS/GC-IMS, and SPME/GC-MS. The E-nose results showed that the volatile profiles of the samples differed markedly, with the solid fractions obtained at 25 and 15 °C (S25 and S15) exhibiting stronger sensor responses and clustering together, whereas the liquid fraction at 5 °C (L5) showed the weakest overall signals. HS/GC-IMS identified total 55 volatile compounds, mainly aldehydes, alkenes, esters, alcohols, ketones, and nitrogen-containing compounds. Compared with refined horse fat, S25 and S15 were enriched in ketones, sulfur-containing compounds, and nitrogen-containing compounds, while L5 was dominated by alcohols and aldehydes. SPME/GC-MS identified 53 volatile compounds, with aldehydes as the main class in all samples. S5 showed the highest number of volatile species and the richest aroma profile, whereas S25 and S15 showed the lowest complexity. The total volatile content ranked as refined horse fat > S5 > L5 > S15 > S25, and ester content followed the order S5 > L5 > refined horse fat > S25 > S15. Overall, dry fractionation temperature significantly regulated the distribution of volatile compounds in horse fat. These findings may provide a theoretical basis for the potential application of horse fat in food processing and product development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.