ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, mainly due to its frequent diagnosis at advanced stages and the high probability of recurrence even after curative treatment. Conventional postoperative follow-up is mainly based on imaging studies, endoscopy and serological tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4)This narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception through June 2026, with 75 studies included in the final narrative synthesis. Among these analytes, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)currently provides the most mature data for the detection of molecular residual disease and postoperative risk stratification. Although it allows for the early detection of recurrent or residual disease prior to imaging confirmation, postoperative ctDNA has shown significant prognostic value in many studies; however, routine use as a basis for decision-making in treatment planning is still considered investigational and will require future prospective clinical validation. Tumor-informed ctDNA approaches offer high analytical specificity and sensitivity in low-burden disease settings. In contrast, tumor-agnostic approaches, such as methylation analysis and fragmentomics, may improve the scalability of the method. However, they require further validation in the postoperative setting. At the same time, emerging data indicate that extracellular vesicles, exosomal RNA and peritoneal lavage analytes can provide complementary biological information, especially in cases of peritoneal dissemination. Despite the significant prospects, the use of liquid biopsy in guiding the treatment of gastric cancer remains under investigation. This is because even today there are limitations. Characteristic are the low ctDNA excretion and the anatomical heterogeneity of the disease, as well as clonal hematopoiesis. Limitations also include the lack of standardization as well as the cost and the need for prospective clinical studies. This review summarizes the biological basis of molecular residual disease, liquid biopsy technologies, ctDNA data, the concept of molecular recurrence, and the future prospects of multi-analytic and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted surveillance models in gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.