Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737594›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Lydia Lazaridou, Kalliopi Vakalou, Alexandra Dimaki, Konstantinos Eleftherios Koumarelas, Konstantinos Zachos, Dimitrios Schizas, Grigorios Christodoulidis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia LazaridouDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Kalliopi VakalouDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Alexandra DimakiDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Konstantinos Eleftherios KoumarelasDepartment of General and Orthopaedic Surgery, Spitalverbund Appenzell Ausserrhoden, 9100 Herisau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-4770
Konstantinos ZachosDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios SchizasDepartment of First Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-0112
Grigorios ChristodoulidisDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, mainly due to its frequent diagnosis at advanced stages and the high probability of recurrence even after curative treatment. Conventional postoperative follow-up is mainly based on imaging studies, endoscopy and serological tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4)This narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception through June 2026, with 75 studies included in the final narrative synthesis. Among these analytes, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)currently provides the most mature data for the detection of molecular residual disease and postoperative risk stratification. Although it allows for the early detection of recurrent or residual disease prior to imaging confirmation, postoperative ctDNA has shown significant prognostic value in many studies; however, routine use as a basis for decision-making in treatment planning is still considered investigational and will require future prospective clinical validation. Tumor-informed ctDNA approaches offer high analytical specificity and sensitivity in low-burden disease settings. In contrast, tumor-agnostic approaches, such as methylation analysis and fragmentomics, may improve the scalability of the method. However, they require further validation in the postoperative setting. At the same time, emerging data indicate that extracellular vesicles, exosomal RNA and peritoneal lavage analytes can provide complementary biological information, especially in cases of peritoneal dissemination. Despite the significant prospects, the use of liquid biopsy in guiding the treatment of gastric cancer remains under investigation. This is because even today there are limitations. Characteristic are the low ctDNA excretion and the anatomical heterogeneity of the disease, as well as clonal hematopoiesis. Limitations also include the lack of standardization as well as the cost and the need for prospective clinical studies. This review summarizes the biological basis of molecular residual disease, liquid biopsy technologies, ctDNA data, the concept of molecular recurrence, and the future prospects of multi-analytic and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted surveillance models in gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeoplasm, ResidualStomach NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcell-free RNAcirculating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAexosomesextracellular vesiclesgastric cancerliquid biopsyminimal residual diseasemolecular relapsemolecular residual diseasepostoperative surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42737594
PMCPMC13565809

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.