ReviewBiology2026
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Cancer: Friend, Foe, or Context-Dependent Modulator?
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) increases tissue oxygen availability through the administration of near-pure oxygen under elevated atmospheric pressure. Although HBOT is clinically established for several hypoxia-related conditions and selected radiation-induced tissue injuries, its role in oncology remains controversial. This review evaluates HBOT as a context-dependent modulator of tumor and normal-tissue biology by integrating evidence on hypoxia-inducible factor signaling, redox homeostasis, tumor metabolism, vascular remodeling, immune regulation, extracellular matrix organization, cancer stemness, and treatment sensitivity. Available preclinical and clinical evidence does not support the historical assumption that HBOT universally accelerates tumor growth, recurrence, or metastasis, but current evidence is also insufficient to support HBOT as a broadly applicable standalone anticancer therapy. The strongest clinical evidence concerns late radiation-induced normal-tissue injury, particularly radiation cystitis, whereas evidence for direct antitumor activity or treatment sensitization remains predominantly preclinical and context-dependent. Selected experimental models suggest that transient reoxygenation may attenuate hypoxia-dependent signaling, alter redox and metabolic adaptation, and enhance sensitivity to radiotherapy or systemic anticancer treatment, while other models demonstrate increased proliferation or vascular responses. Future studies should incorporate standardized HBOT protocols, direct or surrogate measurements of tumor oxygenation, mechanistic biomarkers, patient stratification based on measurable tumor characteristics such as baseline hypoxia, redox phenotype, and microenvironmental features, and precise treatment scheduling. HBOT may ultimately be most relevant as a biomarker- and timing-guided pharmacodynamic reoxygenation strategy in tumors in which a transient reoxygenation window can be therapeutically exploited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.