ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Finite Element Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Soft Actuators: A Hybrid Analytical-Numerical Framework.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pneumatic soft actuators have been drawing considerable attention in the field of soft robotics, thanks to their inherent flexibility, high power density, and safe interaction. However, the strong, intricate coupling between the material's hyperelastic behavior and the reinforcement of anisotropic fibers creates significant challenges for both analytical modeling and numerical characterization of these actuators. In this paper, we design and fabricate a fiber-reinforced pneumatic soft actuator using Ecoflex 00-30 silicone rubber as the base material and helically wound fibers as the reinforcing layer. We set up a theoretical framework that combines the Neo-Hookean model for isotropic silicone rubber with a strain energy-based formulation for anisotropic wound fibers. This framework describes how the actuator is stretched, expanded, twisted, and bent. Finite element simulations are then carried out, focusing on three key design parameters: winding fiber density (three levels: high, medium, low), air cavity offset distance from the central axis (1, 2, 3, and 4 mm), and air cavity cross-sectional geometry (cube vs. cylindrical). The simulations reveal that a higher winding fiber density promotes more uniform stress distribution across both the strain and confinement layers. In contrast, a low fiber density can lead to local bulging and large stress variations, which ultimately compromises the bending performance. The offset distance of the air cavity from the neutral axis is directly linked to the bending curvature: a larger offset produces greater air cavity deformation and higher actuation efficiency. Furthermore, the cuboid air cavity yields a larger bending angle (experimentally validated up to 90° at 0.045 MPa) and better efficiency, while the cylindrical air cavity distributes stress more evenly across the outer surface of the strain layer and reduces stress concentration at the edges. These findings provide useful quantitative guidance for optimizing the structure of fiber-reinforced soft actuators and establish a framework for hybrid analytical-numerical prediction of their mechanical behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.