ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Structural and Mechanical Durability Evaluation of PLLA Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) scaffolds are widely used in tissue engineering because they are biodegradable and have good mechanical properties. Their performance changes during degradation, which is important for the design of biodegradable implants. In this study, we investigated the structural and mechanical stability of 3D-printed PLLA scaffolds during 180 days of in vitro hydrolytic degradation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C. Mechanical properties of the material were evaluated by tensile and compression tests. The material during degradation was analyzed for the scaffolds for which the lost mass and chemical and surface changes were analyzed using FTIR-ATR spectroscopy and SEM microscopy. The scaffolds lost more than 8% of their initial mass throughout the study, indicating slow degradation. However, their mechanical properties gradually decreased. Young's modulus dropped from 2.46 GPa to 2.09 GPa, and tensile strength decreased from 45.5 MPa to 31.1 MPa. The material also became more brittle after about 90 days. FTIR results confirmed progressive hydrolysis of ester bonds, while SEM images showed increasing surface roughness, micropores, and cracks. The results show that PLLA scaffolds maintain their shape and mass during the early stages of degradation. However, their mechanical strength decreases over time. These changes should be considered when designing biodegradable scaffolds for regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.