ReviewCancers2026
Lung Cancer Survivorship: Challenges and Care Needs.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in lung cancer treatment have progressively improved survival across all disease stages. Some patients now achieve long-term survival, while others may remain on treatment for several years, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors and selected tyrosine kinase inhibitors. These advances have increased recognition of the survivorship needs of patients with lung cancer, including persistent symptoms, treatment-related toxicities, and social, psychological, and caregiver-related concerns. The integration of palliative care has also become increasingly relevant, reflecting a shift in the traditional care paradigm by extending supportive approaches beyond the end-of-life setting to patients living long-term with active disease. However, evidence and care models addressing lung cancer survivorship remain fragmented and focus predominantly on patients treated with curative intent. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of survivorship in lung cancer, from screening and early-stage to locally advanced and metastatic disease, while also examining more cross-cutting physical, psychological and social domains. Greater recognition and systematic assessment of these needs is essential to develop structured, coordinated, and personalized survivorship pathways for the growing and clinically heterogeneous population of individuals living with and beyond lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.