Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42738493›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Alpaca Farming and Management Practices in Poland: Online Questionnaire.

Natalia Broś, Iwona Anna Walachniewicz, Joanna Kapustka, Monika Budzyńska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia BrośStudent Scientific Circle of Animal Behaviour, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Iwona Anna WalachniewiczStudent Scientific Circle of Animal Behaviour, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Joanna KapustkaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8175-7299
Monika BudzyńskaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6586-151X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpacas have gained increasing popularity in Poland; however, no official national standards for their husbandry have yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate alpaca husbandry practices on Polish farms using an anonymous questionnaire. A total of 44 farms were included in the analysis, all of which kept alpacas, while only 9.1% also maintained llamas. A high level of adherence to preventive healthcare practices was observed, with regular deworming implemented on 90.9% of farms and vaccination reported by all respondents. Dietary supplementation was also widely practised, with vitamin D being the most frequently administered supplement (90.9%). However, the assessment of biosecurity measures revealed important deficiencies in epidemiological risk management, as only 59.3% of owners quarantined newly introduced animals before integrating them into the herd. These findings provide the first comprehensive overview of alpaca husbandry practices in Poland and may serve as a basis for future research and the development of official husbandry standards for alpacas.

Indexed as

alpacahealth issueskeeping conditionssurvey

Identifiers

PMID42738493
PMCPMC13564683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.