ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Dogs and Cats: Evidence for Gastrointestinal and Emerging Extra-Intestinal Applications.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging microbiome-directed intervention for dogs and cats, but its clinical role remains incompletely defined. This structured narrative review integrates peer-reviewed clinical, mechanistic, methodological, and safety evidence on companion-animal FMT published between 2005 and 2026, with emphasis on efficacy, tolerability, mechanisms, product preparation, donor screening, and research priorities. In dogs, the most consistent clinical signal concerns chronic enteropathy (CE), where observational studies frequently report reduced disease activity scores after FMT, whereas small randomized trials have shown mixed results; however, causal inference remains limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols, and concurrent therapies. The strongest controlled canine signal comes from parvoviral enteritis, where adjunctive enema-based FMT accelerated diarrhea resolution and shortened hospitalization. Feline data support short-term tolerability and measurable microbiome activity, but clinical efficacy remains preliminary; notably, the first controlled feline chronic enteropathy (CE) trial showed no significant improvement in dysbiosis index or clinical activity scores compared with controls. Proposed mechanisms include donor microbial engraftment, metabolic restoration, immune modulation, and gut-brain and gut-skin axis signaling, although veterinary-specific validation remains limited. Standardized donor screening, batch-level quality control, dose-finding studies, long-term safety surveillance, and adequately powered sham-controlled trials are the main prerequisites for responsible clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.