ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Integrated Welfare Monitoring in Laying Hens: A Systematic Literature Review, Expert Insights and a Camera Proof-of-Concept.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective welfare monitoring in laying hens is increasingly challenged by growing flock sizes, declining farm numbers, and the practical limitations of assessor-based protocols under commercial conditions. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies offer opportunities to support large-scale welfare assessment, yet their application in laying hens remains predominantly limited to small-scale or prototype systems. This study addresses three complementary objectives aimed at informing future computer-vision-based PLF research and development in commercially housed laying hens. First, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify welfare-related categories monitored in laying hens between 2005 and 2025, the methods used to assess them, and the extent to which automated monitoring approaches have been applied. Second, outcomes of a TransRegional Expert Panel (TREP) within the OMELETTE project were synthesised to rank priority welfare challenges, evaluate the feasibility of different monitoring approaches, and compare expert perspectives with trends identified in the literature. Third, two pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) camera setups implemented in semi-commercial aviary systems were described as proof-of-concept examples illustrating how multiple welfare challenges can be monitored using a single, multipurpose camera system. The literature review revealed a pronounced imbalance in monitoring frequency, with feather pecking dominating the literature while several other welfare challenges, including piling, disturbed sleep, and toe-pecking, remain comparatively underrepresented. TREP outcomes confirmed feather pecking as the highest-priority welfare challenge but also highlighted the importance of integrated monitoring approaches that combine time-intensive assessments, shorter checklists, and automated systems rather than relying on single indicators. Experts further considered the use of digital devices during routine barn inspections to be practically feasible. The PTZ proof-of-concept demonstrates how priority welfare challenges identified through both literature and expert input can be operationalised through automated, scheduled, and location-specific monitoring under commercial conditions. Together, these findings highlight the need for future PLF research to move beyond isolated measurements and small-scale trials towards integrated, cost-effective, and farm-specific welfare-monitoring systems that support adaptive, data-informed management strategies-for example, within a Plan-Do-Check-Act framework-and enable the development of digital standard operating procedures that generate actionable insights under real-world commercial constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.