ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Degumming of Rapeseed Oil: Phospholipid Recovery, Bioactive Lipid Concentrations, and Molecular Remodeling.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapeseed oil is an important edible oil with a favorable fatty acid composition and contains endogenous phospholipids (PLs) and lipid-soluble minor components that are relevant to refining, oxidative stability, and product quality. In this study, water degumming (WDG), citric acid degumming (ADG), and ethanol degumming (EDG) were systematically evaluated for their effects on oil quality, phospholipid recovery, and bioactive lipid concentrations. A modified Folch extraction was included solely as a laboratory solvent-extraction benchmark for the compositional characterization of phospholipid-rich fractions. WDG and ADG showed the highest phosphorus removal efficiency, reducing phosphorus to undetectable levels, whereas EDG also achieved substantial dephosphorization. ADG produced the highest PL yield (83.22%), while WDG gave the highest oil recovery (98.42%) and PL purity (95.49%). Although the bulk FA composition of the oil remained largely unchanged after treatment, the recovered PL fractions showed clear differences in FA distribution and PL subclass composition. EDG yielded the highest phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) contents, indicating selective enrichment of choline-containing PLs. The concentrations of carotenoids, tocopherols, and phytosterols were also process-dependent. Untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic analyses further showed that EDG induced distinct compositional remodeling relative to crude rapeseed oil. Overall, WDG was preferable for oil retention, ADG for maximum PL recovery, and EDG provided a distinct balance between oil recovery, PL recovery, and enrichment of PC- and LPC-containing fractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.