ReviewCells2026
Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) now reach into every stage of AML care. Deep learning models read therapy-relevant mutations directly from bone marrow smears; automated flow cytometry gating reproduces expert calls in under a minute; and the first AI pathology devices for hematology have cleared regulatory review and entered clinical use. Beyond diagnosis, ML captures the age-dependent weight of individual mutations that categorical ELN scoring misses, drug response prediction for venetoclax-azacitidine has been validated across multiple external cohorts, and large language models are being tested for tumor board support and trial matching. The next wave, from clonal architecture modeling and single-cell foundation models to digital twins and reinforcement learning for adaptive dosing, could move AML management from reactive toward predictive, evolution-aware care. This review departs from existing AI-in-hematology surveys in three ways: we (i) restrict the scope to AML and organize the field around clinical decision points rather than technology categories, (ii) grade every tool on a five-tier author-defined clinical readiness level (CRL-AML 1-5), which exposes hundreds of models clustered at CRL-AML 1-2 and none yet in prospective clinical evaluation, and (iii) close with a numbered three-year agenda naming the consortia, datasets, and pragmatic trials needed to carry the field from publication to practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.